Guangzhou Lianlian TechnologyCo., Ltd applied for patent for invention, which disclosed a recharge systemand a recharge method for mobile phone. It belongs to mobile communicationservice technology field. In 2010, Guangzhou Lianlian Technology Co., Ltdchanged its name to Zhejiang Lianlian Technology Co., Ltd.

On Sep 15^th, 2011, theoriginal review department of SIPO did not consider the technology plandisclosed in this patent application to be a technology plan and thus rejectedthe application.

In November, 2011, Dengyuan Wangfrom High Mark represented Lianlian in the review process. Dengyuan Wangsubmitted documents and supplement documents aiming at the question raised bythe examiner. On July 20^th, 2013, the Patent Re-Examine Boardinsisted that the disclosed technology plan in the application did not satisfythe requirement of the Term 2, Clause 2of Patent Law and thus the applicationcannot be passed. Dengyuan Wang submitted response again. On Dec 5^th,2013, the Patent Re-Examine Board accepted Dengyuan Wang’s opinion and withdrewthe original rejection of the application and decided to continue theexamination procedure.